Recent content by WarrenX148

Yes, I agree. I typically pack 2-3 betrayals myself for a run. But I'm also in a higher medal range where you regularly encounter 2 lv 3 bunkers and a tc full of howitzers. When I was in the 1000-1200 medal range, finding a bunker was a somewhat rare sight, and once I got one the raids seemed...

If you're in the lower medal range, a bunker will deter a LOT of attackers from going for you. Most players at that range seldom bother with players with bunkers because there simply are much easier targets. The fort upgrade opens up MacArthur which is nice and all, but my vote goes to bunker.

Mortars do have a large splash damage, but there is certainly no need to nerf them. They are all but useless on offense as ranged units kill defenders far better and siege units destroy buildings far better.

I have had this happen too, if it is close to the line dividing the direction the plane will come from it is dependent on where you tap/click the screen. Even though it is the same target you can tap opposing corners of the building to achieve different results. Couldn't disagree more. This...

If I may suggest, save your crowns for later ages and use them to crown your blacksmith/armory upgrades. Once you hit enlightenment it will become very apparent that time is against you upgrading everything there since there is only ever one armory, while your citizen population grows over time.

Logically, I can understand mercs not returning. They did their work for the pay you gave them and off they went. Alliance troops on the other hand, I agree with. They should stick around.

Wrote CS about this issue. As expected, I received a cookie cutter response accusing my hardware of being at fault. Not only is my device brand new, but it also ran the game flawlessly for the other hundreds of attacks I have launched. Why would the hardware suddenly decide to be the issue...

I'm not a fan of this idea. I like being able to log off and build an army that takes hours to create; the idea of needing to wait possibly 20-30 minutes after I log on to attack because I lost siege units? Not a nice thought.

Indeed, I'm in the same boat. A setback from 3050 to 3011 is a huge one at that medal level, and it's happened to me at least 3 times. Most times I notice the Dais but clearly I didn't those times, nor should I have to. The bug causing the crash should simply be fixed.

It would seem that Genghis Khan from the old event has been removed from the game recently. Because of this, inactive players who quit during this event and still have Khan's Dais in their town layout are ending up with incredibly high medal numbers, because attacking them results in the game...

Or just force revenge attacks to be available as long as you're not online. Revenge attacks should adhere to different criteria.

+1 for this, really frustrating when you deploy a plane thinking you have a clear line and instead it flies over 3 towers and 2 aa.

Seeing topics like this are always disappointing. There are so many units in the game that simply don't see much (or any) use because units are so widely imbalanced. There is a reason the vast majority of players use the archer/hc/siege/healer combo: it's because nothing else holds up the same...

Also be aware: I encountered a bug when building the second factory. As far as armory upgrades go, it considers the level of your SECOND factory for meeting prerequisites to upgrade units. So despite having a level 4 factory, you are no longer able to upgrade anything until your second factory...

Yes, Chinese ranged base damage is only 60% of the value of a normal ranged unit. However, since they attack twice as fast, they effectively have 120% of the DPS of a normal ranged.