Attacking Specific Players

[Heavens200]

I wish you could attack anyone you wanted by simply typing in their gamer name. However, you would need a level gap in my opinion. For instance, you can only attack people that are 10 levels below your current level. (If I were level 50 then I can only attack someone as low as level 40.) However, I think you should be able to attack anyone that is higher level than you no matter how much higher level they are. My reason for this is that if I were level 33 and I were to attack someone level 51 then earlier stated that level 51 cannot attack me right? Well if the low level witch is me in this case attacked the level 51 first then me attacking the level 51 would show up in their mail and they could hit the revenge button on me once! (Side affect for attacking someone a lot higher level than you are.) Sure the attack function is the game is random for now witch is fine however gamers would have more fun if they could also attack people in specific. Then alliance members close to the same level could raid the same person if they wanted. In other words alliances would also be more fun and cooperative. Not suggesting you take out the current attack method only suggesting to add another attack method. Please reply and tell me what you think.

 

[firedancer]

If you notice... Level has nothing to do with a player's attack strength in this game. This is not a RPG. A person who has high level simply means that s/he is very hardworking in upgrading and researching stuffs. That's the only way you gain XP in this game to 'level up'.

What you should be worrying is Age. Higher Ages will definitely have better advantage to steam-roll lower Age bases. But that's how these games are. When you rise to the higher ages, you will be probably doing the same too. This is a dog-eat-dog world.

 

[Heavens200]

If someone has a high age and they are low level for that age then why worry? They may have good troops however, they will also have low level defences. Thanks for your concern though I have thought this through.

 

[firedancer]

If someone has a high age and they are low level for that age then why worry? They may have good troops however, they will also have low level defences. Thanks for your concern though I have thought this through.

One thing to worry is... while they have weak defenses that may not contribute to their attack strength, but they may have additional army capacity and may have unlocked some pretty devastating research technologies.

 

[Heavens200]

Thats also true however the game already requires you to be a certain level before you can progress to the next age anyways. Also since I did say they should have a level gap of 10 if they did have more defending troops they would also be low level and you would just run them over and if they were high level defending troops then you would not have to worry about it anyways due to the level gap.....it is obvious you disagree with what I am saying so just say so...but you do not have to try and say that this idea would not work when I know it does.

 

[firedancer]

Searching for specific player by name to attack will lead to bullying and harassment. After someone lose to an attacker, he may just go complain to the other alliance members and ask them to revenge for him. Therefore this is a BAD idea. - You happy now?

As for level capping, I'm just highlighting other concerns which may or may not be complimenting to your suggestion. But then, level capping will also lead to a reduction of available bases in search, causing 'nexting' problems.

 

[Heavens200]

If you would kindly take time to read what I said then you would know that I DID NOT suggest that they change the attack feature.... only that they add this one so my idea has nothing to do with hitting the *next* button. They are 2 different attack options. Secondly, the whole point of adding my idea is so people do ask their clanmates for help witch in return makes the alliance more useful and active.... im not trying to argue with you but I would really appreciate it if you would read and take what I am saying into consideration instead of trying to post on here about how your opinion is that this is a bad idea...How can this be a bad idea when your not even trying to understand it? Thank you for commenting your input.....

 

[Heavens200]

Also think about what this could lead to.....Alliances could have war with each other this war. One alliance could look up another alliance and start attacking the members in it from top to bottom (as long as they stay writhin the level gap). Then the alliance that was targeted could retaliate by attacking them back. This could lead to another version of alliance wars but it would take the whole alliance to be active and cooperate witch would also make the game funner in my opinion. I try to look at the bigger picture of things. I agree that by adding this you could say that there will be bullying but isn't this a war game in a way? It happens and besides the one being picked on will still get peace treaties and also they could ask somone in there alliance for help.

 

[VN-ELITE]

it will make a lot of killing and revenger ! alway, and this world full of hate

 

[Heavens200]

Ok..thanks for your input. I guess I should have kept this idea to myself. Quite a bit of views but nobody likes the idea..