First WW match after changes, please report here

[Kalmyre]

6 CWA to our 4, equal atomic then they drop off like a rock with a couple medieval and 12 of 30 being a mix of very low level classic and Iron Age sandbags. I know how to evaluate bad matchup balance, I just used the space ages as an example.

 

[oddin]

Our first 10vs10 is a fair matchup with both alliances having equal chances of winning. It will be a slaughter till the end

 

[Cannibals]

First matchup 10v10 looks fair even with sandbags - theirs of course, our low bases are legit players. Took 30 minutes for a matchup though where before it was instantaneous.

 

[~Kratos~]

Sounds like a worthy trade-off.

 

[Saruman the White]

We had a rather unfair matching, but it's still to early to judge. Perhaps the next matching would be better. By the way, does anyone knows how alliances get matched now?

 

[Wicked Lord]

Our first 10 vs 10 match seems quite fair, the best match for a long time.

 

[kosno]

Our first match is 20 vs20
us them
3CWA 2 AA
5AA 4GA
2GA 10 IA
4 IA 2GPA
1EA 2 MA
1MA
3CLA
1 IA
definitely not a fair match (in favour for us) note that without 15vs15 option we were force to fill 2 spots with whatever was available and 1 is mine 2nd account which we only use in case of a person missing to get full 20. 17 bases are genuine active players.
conclusion: we were forced to use 3 sandbags in order to let 7 genuine members to participate.

 

[Snarlylemming]

First 20v20, unfair match really although they spent a lot on troop tactics even then they had 2 upgraded space age guys well above any of our Cold War guys.

Also so seem to have pre patch war results up rather than recent war on completion.

 

[Alexey]

Our first match was fair, we ended up with a very little gap. And that brought a lot of positive emotions, since we had three mismatches in a raw before that) A victory on the edge is the best that the game can offer us.

 

[Bigbrother]

Nothing different. We run 30v30.
they have 2 SA. 4 CWA. 6 AA. 2 maxed AA base.
we havr 4 CWA 6 AA base. Very unfair. They will max stars us.

 

[HawkEyeHK]

Absolutely unfair match.
We have matched a obviously cheating 10 maxed SA alliance while our side is 4SA(all around lv 260), 5CA, 1AA.
I am a fool to believe this better WW matching joke.

 

[Manifesto]

Posted by Muet:
We built these changes based on a lot of data from our internal systems and tools, but a major factor comes through player comments and discussions from all of our community pages.
So keep the comments and feedback coming.
However, he also said:
We don’t expect the system to be perfect when it first launches
so how about not complaining and just stick to the facts?

 

[Arminius]

Our first 10vs10 was really fair. The result at the end was 50 vs 47. Both teams had Cold War Age down to Gunpowder Age.
Also this was the first war since very long time, where the win/lose glory was almost the same for both teams: ~ 3xx.

No reason to complain this time.

 

[Cannibals]

Us: 10 attacks, 50 stars
Them: 9 attacks, 7 stars

I think this match would not have occurred once recent wins/loses factor in. Oh well, better luck next War.

 

[sileepuppee]

First war was evenly matched and took 23 minutes. 30v30. Both alliances lvl 13. It was win 244, lose 355

Our side 2 cwa, 5aa, 4ga and the rest mostly e.a or lower.
Their side 5 cwa, 5aa, 5ga, and industrials with one i.a

We won 150-135 because we defended prettt which was amazing given they did use max ar but not correctly.



Second war is much more unbalanced if going by the first as well as the fact that they have 5 sand bags to our 1. 6 Cwa 6aa 6ga rest ia other than sandbags. They’re lvl 12 alliance. Is this one we stand to win 340 or lose 270. Sadly while I know we can get max stars, just looking over all the cwa and aa bases, they’re factories have nothing but rpgs and bazooka units. They also have estates on half their bases whereas we don’t one. At least the glory loss will be pretty much what we gained in last war but it’s right to where it was 2 wars in. Using all ar is definitely a big part or the time but using max troops along with the attack takes it to a place we can’t catch with only the troop cards we get from Marco or events.

Also 2nd war took over an hour and we started immediately after.

 

[Freeman]

Them 1 space age, 6 atomic, 5 global, 5 industrial, 2 enlightenment, 1 gunpowder.

Us 1 space age, 3 atomic, 1 Cold War, 3 global, 7 industrial, 3 enlightenment, 2 gunpowder.

We lost 92-50. And we used one more attack than they did. Not complaining though because I know it will get more accurate in the matchmaking over time. Just commenting because I think the developers find this information useful.

 

[Alexey]

Maybe I should return back to my conspiracy theory that estate has a negative war weight)

 

[Cannibals]

Second war

Us: SA, InA, 2 GP, 3 CA, 2 IrA
Them: GA, 3 InA, MA, 5 IrA

Our SA is GA-AA mixed age defenses, while their GA is maxed and hella tough. Obviously our favor, but I don’t feel bad because their 5 bags haven’t logged in for 100s of days. Us 49 stars to their 42 atm, and their max now is 47 though so effectively we win.

 

[W1ll1am]

1st war of the new matchmaking.

Us Them
SA. 0 1
​​​​​​CWA. 1 5
AA. 1 2
GA. 4 2
IA. 5 1
EA. 3 2
GPA. 5 6
MA. 0 1
Iron. 1 0

Is this fair? Who do you think won with assault rallies & RPG's?

 

[Alexey]

Our second war is a mismatch, here are the top ages:
us - them
SA 1 - 3
CWA 2 - 6
AA 6 - 4
Our SA (me) has CWA army, their SAs have space shuttles and SA fighters and (I guess) lvl 4 AR.