Getting Tired of Germans/Brit : How about some small but meaningful changes?

kevstasy

Approved user
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
16
Let's face it. Everyone on high level / top 5 or 10 of alliances are either Germans or British.

With this, those who are not will also eventually switch into Germans (mostly) or Brits.

We don't necessarily need a new nation ( though it will be excitingly good to have one or two )


For starters, we can work with what we already have. I believe Nexon hasn't utilised its existing resources to its maximum potential yet.

We start with boosting the other nations? Just like how they should have been from the very start.

Let's begin with Chinese and Japanese. Let's use these info : https://dominations.wikia.com/wiki/Nations

These were supposed to be "Defensive" nations right? But can you actually see a Chinese or Jap with a 3 def coa in wars?

- Unlikely, especially in high level wars. Maybe it's time for change.


However these "game-changer boosts/changes" will come, rest assured, it's still win-win for everyone.

Nexon's win:
1. defensive players will surely switch - means they'll spend crowns. which means more money for the devs.

2. it will be harder to trample these "defensive players" more than ever - which means people will spend more on troop tactics thus again, more money for the devs.

3. a balanced / diverse game

Players' win:
1. a balanced / diverse game
2. it's either you specialise on defense or attack; you choose, which i believe it should have been that way eversince..

Disadvantage:
the only disadvantage I can see on this is that it will be harder to play as an all-rounder now.. one does not simply go from pure def from last war, into pure offense in the next war. with the boosts, you can still do these but to less effectivity than it is now. otherwise, you can still spend some crowns/money, which well, will support the game.

--------------------

So what can Nexon possibly do about it? A lot, but here are some suggestions.

I'd love to see Nexon step up in boosting Japanese and Chinese Nations defensive bonuses.

Current Chinese Benefits:
  • Increases the number of citizens by 1
  • Grants bonus defenders at the town center: +1 per age
  • Increases Mercenary Army capacity by 1
Improved Chinese Benefits: ( defense and economic balance )
  • Increases the number of citizens by 1
  • Grants bonus defenders at the town center: +1 per age
  • Increase Defender Damage and Health by 20%
Current Japanese Benefits:
  • Town Center shoots at invaders (functions like a Tower). As of version 1.5.67, this building has increased range, but forfeits some rate of fire.
  • Increases the length of peace treaties by 25%
Improved Japanese Benefits: ( pure defense )
  • Town Center shoots at invaders (functions like a Tower). -- the tower to shoot at airplanes too with better damage than your regular tower equal to the player's age.
  • Increases the length of peace treaties by 25%
  • Increase Defensive Buildings Damage and Health by 20%
In this way, we get two "defensive" nations. Chinese being a balance of defensive and economic nation. Japanese being a pure defensive nation.

Small changes, big difference.

There could be other ways/boosts, but at least the figures above is a start. Nexon can also have a look at boosting/tweaking Greeks and Romans in the future.

With these improvements, we will finally, at one point, have realistic diverse nations thus will take the bore out of the current gameplay.

8 Nations
1. Germans - pure offense
2. British - offense / economic(off) balance
3. French - offense / alliance usability(support) balance
4. Koreans - offense / economic(def) balance
5. Romans - offense / independence
6. Greeks - all around ( good for lower ages )
7. Japanese - pure defense
8. Chinese - defense / economic balance

What do you think? Please feel free to comment your suggestions below. Hopefully Nexon will listen.
 

yemen

Approved user
Joined
Mar 24, 2017
Messages
680
I'm opposed to anything that makes defenses stronger at this point without some counterbalancing improvement to offense. Maxed out CWA is already imbalanced in favor of defense, and those players already tend to specialize on defense in most alliances. Don't want to see that tilted further.
 

FroggyKilla

Approved user
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
550
Yes we need new nations. I’m not too keen on making Japan a defensive nation. If they add Russia, they’d be a perfect defensive nation.
 

Manifesto

Approved user
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
1,920
We need attacking nations, not defensive. This game isn't about defending, it's about get-out-there-and-steal-what's-not-yours.
To be honest, that's not a very good example to set for our youth. What have we been promoting all this time? :(
 
Last edited:

Manifesto

Approved user
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
1,920
And don't forget the French, aren't there plenty of French nations high up? Actually, roughly 40% of all people attacking me are French.
 

No Angel

Approved user
Joined
May 1, 2017
Messages
1,386
french-people-french-eagrfx.jpg

Manifesto :rolleyes:
 

LordStark263AC

Approved user
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
875
Yes? Did someone summon me? Would you like to be 5🌟 ASAP? I'll be more than happy to oblige.
 
Top