nerf British

[S_How]

Rather than nerfing british (lame one time band aid for them to focus time on), I'd rather see them try to do overall nation balancing that made all nations beneficial in war. Right now, there are 3 nations worth playing in high end war, they are easily better than all other nations. Other nations are just entirely pointless and have little if no value.

But, in the grand scheme of things, I think this problem is minuscule and should be prioritized way behind things like sandbagging, imbalanced ptw troops, war weight glitches, matchmaking, chat problems, missing stars, etc....these problems are driving people away from the game in droves, not british.

 

[Ludog]

Well said! People cry about everything. How does it sound to you guys when your kid just won't stop. That's how it sounds to the silent majority. LMAO

 

[BeerMan]

We only have three British players among the top 10 in our alliance. We aren't a top-tier alliance, but we're certainly competitive. Rather than nerfing the brits, I would rather seem them buff the nations that nobody uses.

 

[Bigbrother]

French and Brits are ok. But other need a buff.
Greek: build faster and cheaper. Like 6% time building faster, 20% cheaper.
Japanese: Faster defense trooops, 20% more health for defense troops, +3 alliance gate troops.

 

[BeerMan]

I think the Greeks would be pretty good if the existing build perk scaled better. Taking a day or two off of a 12 day build would be significant. A few hours? Not so much.

 

[Master Contrail Program]

Greeks should take 1% off build times with each age. So by global that's 10%. 12 days equals 288 hours so a 28 hour 48 minute reduction is reasonable but certainly not overpowering.

 

[Manifesto]

This game should be about attacking. Nexon should be spending their time improving ways to attack, a nerf should be a last resort.
I would be somewhat ok with nerfing the archers ability to shoot over walls if tanks power was buffed to shoot through walls quicker.

 

[SiuYin]

At least, your alliance should be one of top alliance in order to mention "certainly competitive"
Please look into KA, KS, and check their choice

 

[SiuYin]

Let's concentrate on British first.
Now for each 2 game, you will meet one British, this is too many

 

[obsidi]

british are boring.

+1 range archers ... totally inflexible perk. you will do things this way, period.
it might be OP, but it's unplayably uninteresting... so maybe it's perfect.

 

[Htmk5]

Wich nations are not boring for you?

 

[LordJestix]

Let's concentrate on British first.
Now for each 2 game, you will meet one British, this is too many

Nothing needs to be done to british. They are in a good place. Other nations need to be made better to compete with british.

 

[SiuYin]

if all other nations need some buff to compete with britsh, simply means it is overpowered
nerf british is obviously easier compare buff 7other nations

 

[Wynne D Fanchon]

Good is a bit of an understatement here.

 

[LordJestix]

if all other nations need some buff to compete with britsh, simply means it is overpowered
nerf british is obviously easier compare buff 7other nations

No, it means that most other nations are in a bad state. Even if you nerf british, several of the nations in their current state wont be around at later ages because they simply just worse than others.

Japan will never be good at end game at its current state, its really only decent for early game where troop levels are low and it can defend against them well.

 

[Tsamu]

Factory troops need buffing, so that they are worth using instead of barracks troops. Then all nation's unique units will become obsolete and everyone will be even. Except Romans, who will become the best nation because of their troop capacity bonus.

 

[LordJestix]

Factory troops need buffing, so that they are worth using instead of barracks troops. Then all nation's unique units will become obsolete and everyone will be even. Except Romans, who will become the best nation because of their troop capacity bonus.

Only for wars, British would still remain one of the best for multiplayer raiding.

 

[Htmk5]

In update 5.7 all factory units are getting an extra level, that will make them more competitive.

 

[ColdestRage]

Greeks and French were nerfed. Stil remember when you could 5 star bases with full cavalry troop comp.
Germans were nerfed from beginning since their double rally duration ain't really doubled.
Koreans with recent tactics space upgrade were nerfed cause right now +1 tactic space doesn't make you able to carry additional sabotage/betrayal.
There will come time when brits will be nerfed, just be patient.

From my viewpoint what needs to be done is not nerfing nations that are OP, what should be done is giving nations that are underpowered a buff, because it'll still be as hard to gather NTG's of not too popular nations like Japan or Greek at higher Ages.

Till now I played
French
Chinese
Brits
Koreans
Germans

Each of those nations is good if you know what you are doing.

The only thing I'd change is take away additional dps from Brits and give it to Chinese as Chinese shooters have right now range of 4 and a whole 5% more dps dealt in one second compared to british. That's really bad, there's no reason to pick Chinese as their shoiters are simply far to weak compared to brits/koreans.
But then if even it'd get implemented Koreans would need a buff as they with their higher dps would deal 10% less dps in one second as chinese would do.

 

[Oneofmany]

Of course British are overpowered if your catapult/mortars don't keep up with your age. Atomic/Global base, gunpowder mortars = food. Shooters are pretty squishy if not handled properly. And howies make excellent trap locators when they split from the horde