Raiders are obsessed with houses!

Tiggo

Approved user
Joined
Aug 3, 2017
Messages
136
Raiders should attack food or gold items first but still even if a gold pile is next to them but a house is near even behind a wall they go for the houses. Shouldnt they first target the gold pile?

Same goes with attacking units when a raider is hit by a defender he stops attacking gold or food items but goes for that defender, should prbly. focus on the food and gold, what do you think?
 

Manifesto

Approved user
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
1,920
If a raider targets a house behind a wall instead of a farm or pile of gold it's probably because some part of the house was closer when he was in target acquisition.
I'm in two minds about the 2nd question. Yes a raider should go for the resource and get as much as possible before being killed, but if he can first kill the defender then he can go on stealing, albeit in a weakened state, it's a pickle!
 

Bedlam

Approved user
Joined
Jun 21, 2017
Messages
377
In saying that,you have discovered a great way to protect your resources from raiders or at least slow them down 😀😀
 

Tiggo

Approved user
Joined
Aug 3, 2017
Messages
136
In saying that,you have discovered a great way to protect your resources from raiders or at least slow them down 😀😀

yes i know ;) i just find it weird they attack houses at al (ok they give some miserable 100 gold or something ^^). So you mean nexon put that in purposly to have the defender let some tricks?
 

Quovatis

Approved user
Joined
Aug 29, 2015
Messages
1,454
It's odd that raiders don't attack the town center, which has a ton more resources than houses.
 

Navalis

Approved user
Joined
May 31, 2016
Messages
493
Ya know it's odd come to think of it... Raiders WILL stop to defend themselves when attacked and they are a 'Purpose Built' unit much like the Saboteur who ignores anyone damaging them. Sometimes I do wish Raiders were more like Saboteurs. I would use Raiders more often if this was the case!
 

RottPhiler

Approved user
Joined
Apr 12, 2017
Messages
72
Raiders need distractors in the form of low-resource targets such as houses and enemy defenders, so that there is still some element of strategy in the form of rallying etc. There is no fun in deploying a bunch of raiders that go straight for the resources. Looting needs to be somewhat challenging.
 

Shade SIX

Approved user
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
7
Raider's should go for the resources 1st, ans always...
Only whenthere is no more resources buildings (which should include the TC) should they defend themselves.
 

Manifesto

Approved user
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
1,920
BUT, if a raider doesn't defend itself it will be killed while it concentrates on the resource building.
If it stops to defend itself, and kills the defender, it can go on to other buildings, even in a damaged condition. It can live to fight another day!
 

Tiggo

Approved user
Joined
Aug 3, 2017
Messages
136
Raider's should go for the resources 1st, ans always...
Only whenthere is no more resources buildings (which should include the TC) should they defend themselves.

true but when you go raiding you lose your raiders anyway cause you mostly dont take every defense building anyway. i understand the arguments that distraction is needed or raiders may get to powerful und strategic base building neglecent.
 
Top