There are people who have not logged in for more then 75 Days

Divyank Khetawat

Approved user
Joined
Mar 22, 2017
Messages
38
There are many people who have not logged in for more then 75 days, So please deactivate these bases and accounts till the user log in again..

I don't understand in many Alliances, the leaders and all other council members have not logged in for 30 days still its members keeps on playing in the same alliance. How will they play World War.

There are many alliances with one player or more but all of them have not logged in for more then 30 days.

So what are you doing to remove these useless cluster of bases and alliances. It uses your space in servers and also is a problem to active players.
 

Kaiser

Approved user
Joined
Apr 16, 2017
Messages
11
How is this a "problem" for active players? You do realize that the player base would be too small if they did this. With all the peace treaties you'd run into the "no opponent could be found" way too often. How do you think the economy would look like when all these sub lvl 170bases are removed? It would be impossible to progress without spending a fortune. If they do this every non-spender WILL quit this game.
 

Divyank Khetawat

Approved user
Joined
Mar 22, 2017
Messages
38
Then at least remove them from alliances. As there are 70% of non active players in alliances. There are many alliances which have all members that are in active and then there are some alliances where the leaders and council are non active for more then 30 days.
 

yemen

Approved user
Joined
Mar 24, 2017
Messages
680
Clearing out dead or inactive alliances, or at least making them unfindable with search, would be a huge help to new players looking for active alliances. The dead wood crowds out the good ones in the search box.
 

DomiNationsVigiles

Super Moderator
Joined
Feb 23, 2015
Messages
199
Currently, when you search for an Alliance, it will sort the oldest to appear in on the top of the list.

We can talk to the development team to see if this can be changed to sort on something different. What would your suggestions be?
 

Gosia

Approved user
Joined
Mar 18, 2016
Messages
13
I believe it should be alliance Leaders, not Nexon, who decide about whom they want to keep or kick.
 

yemen

Approved user
Joined
Mar 24, 2017
Messages
680
If the alliance has one member, and that member hasn't signed in in more than x days (10-30 maybe, don't have any stats), treat it as dead and don't show it in search results until that member logs in again.

If the alliance is closed, don't show it in the search results. Maybe add a flag, so someone can search for an old alliance for some reason (curiousity?), but off by default. Most people who search for alliances are looking for active alliances - either to join, or to look at for war purposes.

Make it very easy to look at your opponents alliance in war. I can look them up right now, but it is often harder than it should be, especially if the names are non English characters.
 

LordJestix

Approved user
Joined
May 12, 2017
Messages
805
Currently, when you search for an Alliance, it will sort the oldest to appear in on the top of the list.

We can talk to the development team to see if this can be changed to sort on something different. What would your suggestions be?

Give us some good filters.

Allow us to search based on:

1. Language, i dont want alliances that dont speak English to show up.(already there)
2. Location of alliance, North America, East Europe, West Europe, Australia, etc.
3. Option to only show alliances i can join. (means if i dont meet medal requirements, or if its closed or full, it doesnt show)
4. Option to select minimum and maximum players in an alliance
5. Show weekly total donations(shows how active an alliance is) and allow us to sort on this
6. Show average wars per week.
 

Master Contrail Program

Approved user
Joined
Oct 1, 2016
Messages
350
Yes. We should be have the option to scout our war opponents' alliance screen directly from the war map. Given the international scope of the game it's silly, and often impossible, to be expected to type in an alliance name in Cyrillic or Arabic, for example.
 
Top