Tighten up multi-player matching a little?

Jasonian Empire

Approved user
Joined
Oct 12, 2015
Messages
44
I wonder if you should only be allowed to attack someone of your own age or higher? Also, perhaps opponents should only be matched with they are within 10 lvls plus or minus of one another?

I'm Medieval age, and I can often sweep twelve Classical Age players in a row, getting that 100% each time so I can fill my diamonds in my store house, usually only losing two or three men in the process. I can do this without using generals or war tactics or mercenaries most (not all) of the time. The way I figured out how to do it, is to bleed medals from myself by raiding with small bands (6 or so) of horse raiders, picking up some loot, then deliberately losing. When I get down to 200 medals, the players I'm matched against have little to no chance of standing against me. The players I attack do not attempt revenge most of the time, and I can hardly blame them. The handful that do, die horrible deaths on my walls with nothing to show for it.

Maybe It's not that big of a problem; I made it through Classical age myself, after all. It's just something that seemed to pop out at me. What do the rest of you guys think?
 

acied

Approved user
Joined
Mar 31, 2015
Messages
293
Just wait until you reach gunpowder or enlightment age...

If you tweak your army a bit, you can even have 5 star without any loss at all.....
 

Elobomg

Approved user
Joined
Oct 16, 2015
Messages
10
i think, u should attack your same age and only 1 upper age, and with a min of 5k+20k per age
Stone 5k are so much, in iron 25k bronze 45k classic 65k medieval 85k gunpowder 105k enlight 125k and insdutrial 200k? i mean the minnimun
 
Top