Unfair Pointsystem

Raestloz

Approved user
Joined
Apr 8, 2015
Messages
30
Everybody likes winning, but we also need to find a way to make the losing party feel fine with the situation. A fair battle is one way to do it, and I think another good way is as I said: penalty for preying on the weak, big rewards for standing up to the behemoths. Perhaps there's another way but I haven't figured it out
 

Pearson

Approved user
Joined
Apr 6, 2015
Messages
19
I'm one of those who will attack weaker players if he has loot. if u cant take win/lose, then u shouldnt play a war game. Right now im only lvl 27 classical but regardless my level, if the loot is worth it, i will take it no matter what level ur. I also have destroy plenty of iron, classical, medieval, and gun powerder age. yes i will attack a lvl 55 base if i know i can, and i did plenty
 

Mizzo

Approved user
Joined
Mar 30, 2015
Messages
70
geez your comment just proves that you whine and complain alot. Its a war game through out the centuries, wth did u expect?.
 

Andy

Approved user
Joined
Jan 7, 2015
Messages
215
It's a tough gig. I'm lvl64 now, GP age (and Whatwhat is right - it'll take a long time more than a month to get to Enlightenment unless you're minted)

I move down in medals anywhere between 300 and 700 - I float up, then medal drop, then float back up again. All through these various level I find a MASSIVE range of players, and a massive different abilities. I smash all of them, and I also get smashed by them. One thing I try for is guys with a lot of food or gold, so like me they are maybe saving for something... or, they aren't playing anymore? Either way - time to get stuck in. I see guys anywhere between 20 and 80 medals between that range. There are a LOT more guys with higher medal counts than there used to be!

Because I'm in GP, and I'm saving for things that cost a lot - when I get hit hard I'm loosing 150-300 food or gold, or both.

But I don't cry about it - I take it as an Opportunity! I don't give a crap when I get hit by someone with 50 archers and they get their ass handed to them by my walls and defenders. What I really care about is the guy that wipes me out! I look over these replays MANY TIMES, so I can see how many players he's loosing, where they're coming at the base, what tactics they use.

I loose right... but I WIN, because I make changes, move things around - think about the layout and design.

Then I get back on with kicking someone else in the arse too. That's my job... it's a game.
 

miasmic007

Approved user
Joined
Apr 8, 2015
Messages
105
Oh god.. this dude is like a cry baby knowing that every people here in forum told him thats the game goes on even on the other strategy game like samurai siege and COC.. high level players can attack you by lowering their medals but they'll suffer from loot bonuses from where their level bonuses should be.. don't bother with the medals yet.. just farm loots, grow your base and compete with them. I think you're not belong with this kind of game you should play disney type games LOL
 

Isekai

Approved user
Joined
Apr 14, 2015
Messages
35
Something to look forward to when you're strong enough to crush people half your level... Unless it's a cheat It's not unfair since you aswell will have access to it... I bet when you attack weaker people you won't complain.
 

serenity4jwr

Approved user
Joined
Apr 14, 2015
Messages
79
It isn't just the British. EVERY stronger culture ends up crushing the weaker culture. They may feel badly about it later (Britain, America, Australia, etc) and try to make amends, but many ( Turkey, Serbia, Persia ) simply don't care. Their attitude is "good riddance". This is common even in primitive tribes; if they didn't keep them as slaves, many conquering tribes would simply kill all the men and keep the women as property. The game mechanics try to encourage fairer competition between players of different levels- they should probably tighten the brackets somewhat; but if EVERY OPPONENT was almost exactly the same, the game would be deadly dull. (And a failure. )
 

Demon_Deus

Approved user
Joined
Apr 7, 2015
Messages
15
Not sure what your all talking about but I am lvl 27 just got into classical yesterday. And I say give me more gunpowder folks to face because I like taking 300k worth of resources each attack. :) Just saying they can hit me 30 times and get what I take in one attack. It goes both ways. There is nothing Fair about love and war. Look at world war 2 Poland had horses and Germans tanks. If you want to talk about real world. Even now a days it full on arrows vs AK-47s If you look at some of the tribes that have been separated from the world.

So yes it sucks getting hit by a gunpowder age folk but you also have to consider your benefits. They hold more resources so easier to raid big catches in one go from them. And do your upgrades.

If trophies are a concern for you then you got your shit mixed up. Because that's a endgame thing.
 

miasmic007

Approved user
Joined
Apr 8, 2015
Messages
105
Its a part of the game.. its a perk of a player who had advanced his base than other players. its his choice to bully those lowbies to farm or stay on those of the same level as him later on once the alliance war came into the game it'll be complicated for those players who keeps degrading their medals though some decent big name guilds has a big medal requirements..
 

Kunta Kinta

Approved user
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
1
In Clash of Clans you can only attack some 1 above or 1 below your TH level. As a TH9 I can only attack a TH8 or TH10, that's the way it should be. Being able to wreck TH7's as a TH9 would be just dumb. Thats what it sounds like is happening.
 

Koa the λyatollah

Approved user
Joined
Apr 5, 2015
Messages
14
Oh god.. this dude is like a cry baby knowing that every people here in forum told him thats the game goes on even on the other strategy game like samurai siege and COC.. high level players can attack you by lowering their medals but they'll suffer from loot bonuses from where their level bonuses should be.. don't bother with the medals yet.. just farm loots, grow your base and compete with them. I think you're not belong with this kind of game you should play disney type games LOL

bro you started a bug/exploit thread about a colly wonder with 20% more HP than you before giving the guy a chance to explain why your colly didn't have that many HP and one grade lower units.. just saying brotha jumping the gun a little by making fun of him yea?

I agree this dude's a tool though
 

Andy

Approved user
Joined
Jan 7, 2015
Messages
215
I agree with KK - one level either side would be a bit fairer. But there are a hell of a lot of dudes even at the same level it's easy to raid, maybe they dont have walls setup well etc. So you're still going to get smashed. Look at your own setup, better yourself. That's all you can do.
 

Whatwhat

Approved user
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
419
you can only attack ages below you. so as enlightenment i can only attack medi and GP.
 

Isekai

Approved user
Joined
Apr 14, 2015
Messages
35
I agree with KK - one level either side would be a bit fairer. But there are a hell of a lot of dudes even at the same level it's easy to raid, maybe they dont have walls setup well etc. So you're still going to get smashed. Look at your own setup, better yourself. That's all you can do.
People will still complain, unless they never lose they won't be happy.
 
Top