2 war leagues please for f2p and p2w - normal and wallet league

[MartinK12]

I understand both - free to play and pay to win. But mixing those two in Dominations wars is just sick!

So please create 2 war leagues:
1. normal league - where u can use only normal troops from barracks and war factories plus event troops,
2. wallet league (after reaching certain point in glory system) - where u can use all inventory units.

Thank you. Hope to see it soon in the game

 

[Mythic]

If players could reach the top of a league for free, why would they pay? If a game makes no money to pay employees and maintain servers, etc., how can it continue?

 

[MartinK12]

You are right but you are missing the obvious point. In wars u can use paid troops and an army of paid troops can make a huge difference, ie IA with paid troops can 5 star strong GA player which isn't possible with normal troops and it shouldn't be possible. So winning wars depend on your wallet. And it's just a matter of time until we will have alliances for paying players only

FYI in Clash of Clans you don't have paid troops and they are more than fine with their money for employees, servers, etc.

And u can still use paid troops during normal raids.

 

[Eddie F1]

That was a F.U. in war design - they should have kept it pure with no event or paid for troops. They got rid of Blessings, which was good, but then re-introduced them as Coalitions! Morons.

 

[Norcaltone]

Bad idea, the obvious fix is to not allow inventory troops in war attacks. I agree that they have cheapened war with the introduction of coalitions and these event troops that can be bought.

 

[Ravenlord]

Morons? Or smart business??!

 

[Max_imus]

Bad idea, the obvious fix is to not allow inventory troops in war attacks. I agree that they have cheapened war with the introduction of coalitions and these event troops that can be bought.

Haha tell me that after you attack a guy with lvl12 walls and lvl6 Indian coalitions

 

[GailWho]

If we have 2 leagues it should be for alliances who can field larger war (30+) and a separate one for smaller wars (10-25). How would you be able to realistically have a league of spenders vs non spenders? Most alliances have people who spend to some degree in it. I think what's more frustrating is an alliance who wins but still hasn't reached the top 100 because the glory reward is too low and the bottom of the leaderboard keeps migrating up.

 

[Glacier]

If we have 2 leagues it should be for alliances who can field larger war (30+) and a separate one for smaller wars (10-25). How would you be able to realistically have a league of spenders vs non spenders? Most alliances have people who spend to some degree in it. I think what's more frustrating is an alliance who wins but still hasn't reached the top 100 because the glory reward is too low and the bottom of the leaderboard keeps migrating up.

Yeah, seems like that deal with ww winner % isn't or never has been involved with matching like we were told when glory went live.