Betrayal Tactic = Joke?

[firedancer]

Is the Betrayal tactic a joke? 22K roasted chicken, 40 mins train time and can only recruit 2 dudes?

And there I was trying to let as many defenders spawn as possible and then dropped the tactic only to find that nothing much happened.

 

[MoguMogu]

Yeah it should be for at least 5 or 8 troops. Afterall, their attack speed n DPS is greatly reduced, so only capable to recruit 2 is really not worth the waiting time n price. Even 2 Demolition can blow up one defense building, while 4 cavalry with 80% reduced damage n attack speed can't even stand their ground to distract other enemy troops in few seconds...

 

[dbukalski]

Even 5-8 troops stolen with reduced damage is worthless. Sever cav stolen with full dps would be ok though

 

[dbukalski]

Several.......

 

[Redgar]

They should make more viriery on tactics recovery time. If it was 5-10 mins to wait I could use it, even that 1st useless tactics could be used.

 

[somuchdust]

the wait time for tactics is so horrid.. 35-50 minutes for any tactic is crap. especially since we can only have like 4 tactics. double the amount of tactics and keep that 40 min time or cut the time in half and keep only 4 allowed..

 

[Redgar]

And it's the EA and the most expensive tactics. It has to be cool. This could be fixed with recovery time at least. 5 mins recovery could make it competitive.

 

[Damascus]

Since I use cav as my main event and everything else supports, the tactics I go in with is first aid and support. In my opinion, defensive troops, particularly foot soldiers, are the biggest concern to Cav players, so the theory of Betrayal has its appeal. But plucking off two troops, even without the reduction in troop effectiveness, combine with the time and cost makes this tactic incredibly ineffective. No point in using one of my tactic spaces for it.

 

[dbukalski]

Arrows is better for anti defender tactic. Cheaper faster build time more effect