First Glory Reward!!

[GailWho]

Yeah that's true ... But then why is it that Equal's alliance and HZ have same potential reward? HZ has 12 global, 9 IA, 2 EA and 2GP in our 25v25 war. Strange it's the same.

 

[King Barbs]

Our first Glory points were 570 in a 35 v 35 war

 

[Funks]

whats the smallest sized war we can have? 10v10?

 

[Vixen]

Yes 10 x 10

 

[Nathan Win]

570 for 30 vs 30, too lazy to list all the ages on the roster.

 

[Equal]

So it looks like the opponent we face has no difference to potential glory points. Strange. Like do 35vs35 war with only medieval and gunpowder players and you get the same reward?? I thought that strenght of the opponets also would be a factor. Now looks like only the war size. Bug?

 

[Equal]

If this is true, then run wars with maximum members available and go for a upset once or twice against stronger opponents and later we will be rewarded more than constantly winning 20,25 sized wars. Nexon... And i trully hoped something good out of this system. ;-)

 

[GailWho]

I think our alliances must have similar average player age that's why we have same potential glory. While we have more global and more at the lower end you have more IA in the middle. I wonder who would win There are other peeps who have different levels for same size wars. So it seems age does matter.

 

[Savate]

10v10 is 325/0. (First war started since Glory went live).

 

[Quang t legend]

If this is true, then run wars with maximum members available and go for a upset once or twice against stronger opponents and later we will be rewarded more than constantly winning 20,25 sized wars. Nexon... And i trully hoped something good out of this system. ;-)

No, it is like medal. The way to win big glory is defeating high glory alliance.

 

[Max_imus]

15v15 WW ...Glory reward 366 and many EA players in the team.

 

[S_How]

Yes the only thing I can think of is that you have the same average age (I would guess most teams fall into either EA or IA averages?)

 

[Equal]

Mabye someone can share their second ww glory points available for the win, if you do the same size ww. We lost our first ww so for the second we have the same 486 points, but the enemy is way weaker (not by the ages, but by the "visual" strenght). In my opinion Nexons claim that opponents strenght matters for the glory reward is a fairytale.. "
Alliance Average Rating: Up to 2.7x more Glory is at stake based on all combat-related upgrades its members have made. More details later." This was from the initial Design Spotlight thread. And look at the current leaderboard. One of the top alliances squads top member is level 135. So how to explain this i have no idea.. opponents strenght matters. Yeah, sure...

 

[phil_dee]

+580/-732 for our second war

 

[Ravenlord]

My alliance has 12000 glory points - woohoo!! (granted there's only 6 of us but still .....)

 

[Vixen]

We are running a babies war for the beginners - level 70 and under only (including iron and classical) - 15 x 15 glory is 334

 

[Imaera]

We won our first war with glory: 10vs10 - 325 points
Out team: 1global, 2industrial, 1enlightenment, 3gunpowder, 2medieval, 1classical
Their team: 2industrial, 4enlightenment, 4gunpowder

 

[Equal]

For our next war we have possibility to earn 419 glory and loose 486. Looks like there is some opponents strenght factor when we do more wars. I hope it will continue like that.