List of Issues

[SiuYin]

1. World War Matching:
Slow, buggy, always mis-matched. Dont waste time in fixing sandbag, just match by glory please
2. World War Glory:
When you facing a alliance with more glory, You could lost more glory than gain. It is a joke, please test.
3.Alliance Troop:
Please fix the troop size over limit. Why it is hard?
4.Nation balance:
Nerf British

 

[LordAnubis]

matching by glory slone is pointless. you could have all rushed atomics with low glory. what did that solvem nothing because then youll be complaining about mismatched and lopsided wars.

point 2 of your post is also irrelevant since your focus is strictly on glory. again you could have all rushed atomics with less glory and still lose. if you won then youd be complaining about not getting enough glory.

its a pandoras box you open by strictly looking at glory

 

[SiuYin]

matching by glory slone is pointless. you could have all rushed atomics with low glory. what did that solvem nothing because then youll be complaining about mismatched and lopsided wars.

I don't care about mismatch, We are already full size alliance and high in glory. we welcome any kind of challenges.


I dont understand why you worry about match by glory, arm yourself and fight for high glory. it is the point of alliance leader board.

 

[TinSoldier]

Hi SiuYin!

1.) The new matchmaking fixes were introduced about a week ago. Please let customer service if you're still experiencing unreasonable wait times on finding a war.
2.) Just yesterday, we made an update to the Glory calculation. Your next war should provide Glory that is more regular.
3.) The new Alliance Perks system will allow players improve their troop cap. We will monitor donations further with this update.
4.) The designers are looking at bringing additional balance to the game in different ways. Updates to game balance can be found here:
https://forum.nexonm.com/forum/nexo...4705-game-balance-updates-latest-post-5-23-17

 

[LordJestix]

Hi SiuYin!


3.) The new Alliance Perks system will allow players improve their troop cap. We will monitor donations further with this update.
4.) The designers are looking at bringing additional balance to the game in different ways. Updates to game balance can be found here:
https://forum.nexonm.com/forum/nexo...4705-game-balance-updates-latest-post-5-23-17

3. This is not the issue at hand. He is referring to the fact that players can request more troops than they should be allowed to request.

4. These balance changes have nothing to do with the balance of power between nations mentioned by the OP.

 

[Quovatis]

Yes, these two responses are completely irrelevant to the initial points made.

 

[Quovatis]

For 3) he's talking about the bug/exploit allowing 2 or 3x the normal alliance troop count to be used. It has nothing to do with the perks.
4) Nothing mentioned there regarding Brit balance.

 

[Angel forever]

Here's an idea. Let's not nerf the Brits. Two reasons 1 I would just switch to a heavy tank style attack as it's juts as good maybe even better. Guess we better nerf heavy tanks two. Let's nerf decoy should be two space Better yet let's just nerf the entire game blah join the party or be left behind! Quit nerfing and just play.

 

[LordJestix]

Here's an idea. Let's not nerf the Brits. Two reasons 1 I would just switch to a heavy tank style attack as it's juts as good maybe even better. Guess we better nerf heavy tanks two. Let's nerf decoy should be two space Better yet let's just nerf the entire game blah join the party or be left behind! Quit nerfing and just play.

Ive posted ways to improve other nations, but everyone seems to state they just want brits nerfed...

 

[Imaera]

Have anyone noticed, that industrial korean shooter's damage is equal with british atomic shooter's damage? Let's nerf brits, and switch to koreans!
Then lets nerf koreans! And french tanks too. Also greek tanks. Let's make one big nation only! Let's quit playing...

 

[Evningcome]

British are OP with shooters that have range of 5 ,nothing beside mortas can hurt them ,but on top of this they can afford to use up to 7 decoy tactics (because they don't need to sabotage TC or Castle - this are not triggered in 99% simply being out ranged by shooters) . Shooters are very cheap units that can be spammed with Only Tier 2 upgrade in University .That's why every second ...Every second that I find in multiplayer is British .They are superior to other nations and deserve nerf ! Simple fix - not allow shooters to fire over walls .

 

[SiuYin]

Hi SiuYin!

1.) The new matchmaking fixes were introduced about a week ago. Please let customer service if you're still experiencing unreasonable wait times on finding a war.
2.) Just yesterday, we made an update to the Glory calculation. Your next war should provide Glory that is more regular.
3.) The new Alliance Perks system will allow players improve their troop cap. We will monitor donations further with this update.
4.) The designers are looking at bringing additional balance to the game in different ways. Updates to game balance can be found here:
https://forum.nexonm.com/forum/nexon...t-post-5-23-17

It remind me another issue, please stop robot replies from CS.

For World War Matching:
On Wed, fail to match for whole day
On Thu, We match a team with 2k glory higher than us, and give us +71 / - 260, it is crazy.

Please stop the stupid thing on fixing sandbag. I don't have a single bit of confidence for BHG's developers, just make it match by glory, it will fix everything.
There is no point to match by so-call even match when there is a alliance leader board.
It is fair that if you would like to got a high position in the board, you should fight more and fight big

 

[Drunken Master]

Yep... My alliance could destroy half the leaderboards, but the other half the leaderboards, we don't stand a chance. Guess which half of the leaderboard we match up with every war... Makes no sense that I have to recruit gunpowder age bases so I can make my alliance weaker. Instead of trying to get a higher war weight, I am proactively trying to lower our war weight without sandbagging with iron age bases. Their is no reason some of these alliances should be on the leaderboards because they dominate low weight alliances as a low weight alliance. I could do a 40 person war with 15 + players over level 190 and my last place player be a global age 160 or so. Why are teams on the leaderboard ranked as high as 40 that couldn't put an Alliance roster together like that to match us? And guess what, we will never get to war with them because we are too strong...

That leaderboard should be based on much more than just glory... I think there should be leagues just like multi-player. They should be based on avg player level and size of alliance. Maybe take longer to setup and get right, but it could work... The system as is rewards low weight.. There is no fix for that. It needs to be changed... Then you will see a huge reduction in sandbagging...

 

[Swięty]

What's the name of your super strong alliance?

 

[SiuYin]

It is my point.
If there is no change in matching system. a heavy weight alliance will always facing KA/ KS
it is non sense that a small alliance with GA / IA /EA stay high in the leader board just because the idiot matching system

Previously my alliance are 15 AA 15 GA, average level is 170, but highest rank is 30
Now we recruit more AA for 5.7, with 30AA, average level 200, and now drop out from leader.

It is crazy and stupid