Glory points according to matches unrelated to glory makes no sense. The opposite is also true....
A match by Glory would match, let's say rank #35 vs #52. It would not be a fair match at the beggining, but eventually it would level out. Points by Glory (like now) would be even, or close. One team would go up, the other one down, by the same margin. This ELO system would not work, as I said before, as long as teams can start from scratch, and there's not to prevent that...just like merges in a team that would strat from 12,000.
Which leaves Glory points unrelated to Glory Ranking. If a match is balance (which it never is for the weaker team), the points awarded should be balanced. If I remember correctly, more points were suppose to be given to heavier teams, which it should be, more than Glory rank or size of the team. In this propose system, team #35 who matches #356 would get the same split in points, according to their total weight. So teams with 25 AA matching other teams with 25 AA, would play for let's say +/- 500 points, and have a better chance of advancing then 20 IA vs 20 IA who would play for +/- 300. Eventually, heavy teams would be up top, and mid size weight teams would be a bit lower, but no more would a team ranked top10 play for 1-10 points every single match, and risk losing 1000. If teams are balanced, same points...but then, BHG needs to find a way for better balanced matches....and they aren't really listening anyways...so I just realized I lost 15 minutes of my time...