Rebalance

[Shadrock]

I do not understand why all Ages were rebalanced. For example as an Industrial, I can always challenge myself by attacking a Global, so I could choose when to challenge myself. Now, you have made the choice for me, and the game is worse. Here is why.

If I fight on level, I now have to use multiple tactics meaning I have to wait 2-3 hours before fighting again. If I do not get 5 stars, then I lose my General for 24 hours making the next attack even harder if I run out of Generals. I also feel worse because I am constantly losing, and psychologically that just makes me want to quit. Who wants to constantly lose at something?

The imbalance, if there was once, was only at the Cold War level. That is the only thing that should have been changed. I completely understand if those players want a challenge, but the top level of any game is the only one that should be hard. When you add a new age above Cold War, Cold War should be made less challenging, because then CWA can fight up to challenge themselves.

To make the game more enjoyable again, please consider.

1. Rolling back the changes except for Cold War age and restoring the tactics blessing

or

2. Reducing the time to train a full army with tactics to 15 minutes and reducing Generals refeneration time to 4-6 hours.

I know you do not care, but I just figured I would try before quitting.

 

[Oh dear you?]

Well said Shadrock.

i have seen a smattering of supporters to this rebalance, but the vast majority are hating it. I am a lvl 194 GA player, and have to raid really low down in the medal ranges for resources and NTGs. Wars are a different matter, and I am still finding my feet with them.

i fail to understand the logic (AND SILENCE) of Nexon/BHG. They have undertaken a massive change which was not requested, and ignored the changes that were. They are alienating the regular players, and payers, who will leave to play other games and it is then difficult to attract new players thus the game dies. Unless of course you are fed up of dominations and want to move onto something else?

make a communication either;
1) supporting the rebalance and stating that this is an overwhelming success with huge positive support from player (ie let us leave to play other games as you will never listen to your community)
2) admit you may have been wrong and water down some of these changes.

TinSoldier Over to you

 

[No Angel]

Those supporters are players with defense-approach playing nature.
​​​​​​Maxing every defense building before moving up.
​​​​​​

 

[Muschristian]

Nah... there isnt imbalance at Cold War Age either... there wasnt really much imbalance anywhere to be honest Event Armies are the problem and Nexon BHGs greed.

not for a like for like base anyway. I couldnt 5* a high Cold war base before the changes and the only thing I lack is Suersonic Fighters and high level Generals.

Before the changes really strong Cold War players still used Event Armies like anyone else on a tough base.

;-)

The only reason I went Cold War and grafted all summer was so I could consistently destroy my own base (which us mainly Global defences) without the need for Event Armies, so I could be more sustainable in wars for the majority of the time.

Now I'm chuffed, only a handful of event armies left... and would be a massive strain on the team if I war without them.

If there was a proper 0TT checkbox or something for war searches at least who chooses to and choses not to would at least be on a level playing field and feel mire inclined to enjoy a non biased war.

Mus
British Lions!
British Lions!!

 

[pckrn]

nah ive been seeing a maxer complaining in recent threads. and on the other hand I, a rusher, am not against the rebalance. people with max-def in a less-than-max age still need to farm. people with max-off and less-than-max def dont really need a lot of resources and can afford to try stuff and enjoy the challenge

 

[LordStark263AC]

would be a massive strain on the team if I war without them.

I wonder how many hundreds of thousands people can relate to that at this precise moment?

 

[Funken_A]

Those supporters are players with defense-approach playing nature.
​​​​​​Maxing every defense building before moving up.
​​​​​​

NO... I am a max everything before moving up player who has mostly defense choices for wonders and Japanese and I don't like this update.

If anything I wanted more incentives to move up in leagues, less training time so I can bring full army attacks more often, and less upgrade times so fully maxing any age does not take 1.5 year or more

 

[pauloricardois]

Galera! Esse reequilíbrio pra mim esta mais para desequilíbrio total !! A graça do jogo não é defender, mais atacar e ter sucesso!! a diversão é a vitória e não a defesa!! ACABO O DINAMISMO QUE JÁ ERA POUCO! Ao invés de se preocuparem em diminuir o TEMPO de gerar tropas no Quartel, Fábrica, Táticas na academia e Generais pra melhorar a dinâmica do jogo, fazem essa cagada! DESEQUILÍBRIO esse é o nome da coisa!

 

[Mcnasty]

I max everything and I’m pissed about this stupid rebalance. All the research I did was shoved down the drain. Spending all the time and resources in university to make offence stronger just to have it nerfed by yet another defence buff. Way to go nexon. They obviously no nothing about their game and that showed big time when I watched the live feed of tin soldier attacking it was terrible it was like watching my 8 year old trying to attack. They may as well take uni out of the game cause they keep making the research in there obsolete

 

[shukra]

i too am concerned that the rebalance effect on university and museum have reduced them to unworthy.

 

[Attila]

Imagine if you hadn't done the uni research. You'd be vaporized in the first 30 seconds of every battle.