Bigger Alliances and Longer Leaderboard

[Bardeuss]

Dear Nexon
I am writing to you as a leader 1st Poland (one of the biggest alliances in Poland) in agreement with other polish top alliances. I writing to you because I’m afraid about future our clan and polish community. Last few changes as reduction some tactics space, active stronghold after destroy and a lot of small changes and bugs have cause that a lot of players (in a lot of alliances - not only polish) resigned from world war and a lot of alliances playing wars for 15-25 players in 50 players clan witch is a bit frustrated for other active players. That’s I have some ideas. Can you do the next update or in the future and to consider my idea about create bigger clan like 50 players (e.g. 80-100 players in one clan)? Secound my idea is to make leaderboard for 300-500 alliances as was previous in medal leaderboard long time ago. I asking about it because is a lot of alliances out of leaderboard but they are suspend in space and they don’t know where they are, they haven’t got any motivation to go up in leaderboard but they are far away to the top 100. Can you consider my two ideas in the future updates.

Best Regards,

Bardeuss

Leader of 1st Poland

 

[LordJestix]

The player base cannot support bigger clan as it is dwindling. Wars should be available up to 50 though.

 

[Bardeuss]

Ok, wars can stay for maximum 50 players but number of players in alliance can be extended to 80-100

 

[LordJestix]

Im telling you this game doesnt have the playerbase to support such a big alliance size change.

 

[malykrzys]

About ranking. That's really shame. Ranking involve just top100 clans in dominations. In every single similar games (such as clash of clans, forge of empires, battle ages even stupid asterix&friends and much much more games) involve thousands of clans in rankings. How many alliances we have in dominations? Top100 is nothing. Even before in 2016 we had top500. Why nexon resigned with this? In top100 appears just the strongest alliances and rest (which is more than 99%) dont have any chance appear in any ranking so they have no motivation and any point for fights in ww. I think is time to change thisrr. Same alliance ranking and single ranking (especially last 40-50 players who not supposed to be in ranking with 800 medals) because this is ridiculously that game with milions of players involve ranking top100 alliance and top200 (which is not correct done) single players.

 

[dominations vin]

some good points in op, Bardeuss. while i could see some pros and cons to teams allowing >50 members the leaderboard should be at least the top 200 imo.