Cancel the 6 troops limit donation.

[VictorDominations]

To be honest, I never understood the limitation of donating only 6 troops to your allies.
Now that you can have 56 alliance troops (even more if you are still French for some reason) this is really annoying to wait to be filled especially if not many players are online.
Nexon, why wouldn’t you guys disable this limitation in general? And let everyone decide how many troops he/she wants to donate?

Or at least, can you please explain the reason for this limitation in the first place?

 

[pckrn]

muet said they’re going to expand the limit, because of the increased alliance troops capacities. didnt know he was referring to Sally Ride research at the time because that info wasnt available to us yet lol

 

[Berend_War]

To be honest, I never understood the limitation of donating only 6 troops to your allies.
Now that you can have 56 alliance troops (even more if you are still French for some reason) this is really annoying to wait to be filled especially if not many players are online.
Nexon, why wouldn’t you guys disable this limitation in general? And let everyone decide how many troops he/she wants to donate?

Or at least, can you please explain the reason for this limitation in the first place?

Removing it completely would give some interesting options for the lower players for example cw loading 20 shooters into a gunpowder base would maybe a to big advantage. Not sure but think that maybe that is one of the biggest reasons the cap is there.
just my thoughts.

 

[oddin]

I support the removal of the 6 troop limitation because it will be a nightmare for someone to get a full alliance army by 1 player and will need 2 or more to fill his request.

 

[~Kratos~]

That does not change anything, it is still all CWA troops being donated to lower age players in high stake wars, even with the limit. The difference is just how long we have to wait for the requests to be filled.

I support the full removal of the cap, it is just an annoyance.

 

[Manifesto]

One CW player donating 18 shooters is no different to 3 CW players donating 6 each, the result is the same.
One person donating is less time consuming for the receiver waiting for the troops.

 

[Tsamu]

I have no trouble filling a request for 56 troop space by myself. 2 heavy tanks and 3 bazookas. Done.

I do not support removing the limit. I might support it increasing to 8.

 

[Manifesto]

That's fine for you but what if someone simply wants shooters or footmen or raiders, etc?

 

[VictorDominations]

Just out of curiosity, how will it harm anyone if Nexon cancel the limit?
Just like Manifesto said, it’s not only about you. And where is the logic behind the 8 for example? How is that different from 6 or 20?

And btw, 2 HTs and 3 bazookas as you said they are 60 troops not 56.

 

[VictorDominations]

TinSoldier ?

 

[TinSoldier]

This is something the team is looking into. I'll be happy to share more information about the change as soon as it is available!

 

[Mountainking]

Remove that useless cap. Useless idea. Not every body can donate to war and it takes ages and multiple requests to get the proper troops ...

 

[Berend_War]

Bit of a late response. But not all alliances have 3 coldwar donators. A alliance with no coldwar won't have that advantage of removing the cap.
Not against removing the cap. Just thinking removing the cap entirely will give a alliance with only one cw a huge advantage over those that don't.

 

[Mixie]

How about giving this unlimited cap donations to alliance leaders and councils? They don't have any more meaningful jobs, especially councils

 

[Berend_War]

Would expect a enormous grow in counsils

 

[Sneakyboy]

Yes,please remove the donation cap. There is no downside.

 

[sileepuppee]

With the cap removed, will just donate more rpgs to players to go with their ar. =)
But I think it's a good idea to remove it. It won't really make a difference for the higher levels but for lower levels players it would make for good strategy. Taking all brit ranged shooters for example since there is a difference is their ability. It would make the goal of receiving "X" amount of single troops faster to get them crowns. Now that my cap is currently at 46 I'll take 11 rpgs from one player rather than a mix of random lvl bazooka troops since there's only 2 active cwa players in our alliance.

 

[kilgore_trout]

It shouldn't be blindly removed, it needs to be adjust in accordance to troop strength(Giving a player 6 mitra shouldn't be on par with donating a bunch of factory troops). I'm not sure how youd calculate that but giving someone the ability to pump someone with powerful troops is going to have some adverse consequences, and would warrant a flood of "reinstate the cap," threads

 

[~Kratos~]

It shouldn't be blindly removed, it needs to be adjust in accordance to troop strength(Giving a player 6 mitra shouldn't be on par with donating a bunch of factory troops). I'm not sure how youd calculate that but giving someone the ability to pump someone with powerful troops is going to have some adverse consequences, and would warrant a flood of "reinstate the cap," threads

Pumping someone with powerful troops is already the only way to go for war and in any competitive alliance, it is already being done so. The only difference removing the cap would make in this regard, is that we wouldn't need 2-3 players to fill a full donation of RPGs/smaller troops that you need more than six of.

As said above, there are no downsides to fully removing the cap. None. It is a silly limit.

 

[Berend_War]

When I become CW our we have one in our alliance. And Sally Rides troop donations are researched for the higher allies. The cap can be removed. Not before that
What's wrong with a little team work.