We don`t want DomiNations to be Cash War – we want back our World War!

[Jakob_888]

Great post Don Mugel

 

[Europeos]

It is sad this forum is populated by people who resort to insulting just for the sake of it. Don't you realize that more extra troops means more stalemates, which in turn will encourage people to use even more sandbags?

 

[Jakob_888]

Im leader of 1st Dynasty and im lower level then you. Many of us are

 

[Don Mugel]

Hi Radzeer!

I believe that sand-bagging should be restricted as much as the use of more than one eventarmy in world war attacks. Perhaps next week I'll make another poll on this issue - would only have to find a few concrete alternatives, so that the vote makes sense. Do you have a concrete proposal on sandbagging? Pelase share, that I can use it. Thanks!

 

[Empire]

Empire Guard - I think you meant the response for him/her

 

[Radzeer]

Of course I have:
1) Allow only 4(5) Ages spread for selecting the war squad
2) Allow max 30(40?) XP level difference of the last ranked player for the matchmaking to be set.
3) Use the median member to compare two alliances strength by matchmaking
4) Introduce the last tie braker rule: in case all current rules define a tie, the alliance with a lower level last ranked guy loses.

 

[Radzeer]

@DynoBot: Just don't use sandbags. You can get enough EA, IA members to teach and use in war to outweight your whales. Explain to your team, that being on the top of the Glory list is a shame currently.

 

[Vixen]

Like !!!!!!

 

[Nb4powerup]

Hi all! We appreciate the feedback and this is something we've been closely monitoring. We'll also be speaking to this in the upcoming State of the Nations.

 

[Veldan]

First the sandbagger glory changes, then the food for walls announcement and now this. BHG is on a roll

 

[Vixen]

Yay ..... see it is worth keeping these issues going on forum !!!!

 

[Don Mugel]

Thanks Radzeer, I have noticed your ideas for later use in a poll at sandbagging!

Option 4 is a really interesting one!!!

 

[Wendy]

voted for option B but A would be great as well

 

[Norcaltone]

It gets worse by the day... I voted for B one special army per war attack gives Nexon revenue and makes war about skill again

 

[Quali]

If these armies are to continue how about giving us the troops used summary? We would at least then have the vaguest idea about how our war bases are performing.

 

[Vixen]

This has become a joke... I have an EA account full of special troops... doesn't matter about skill anymore.. when I am losing I can just drop the specials! Nexon ... who is making these dumb dumb decisions???
BFisher
I am not tagging NB4 as in my eyes he isn't part of the "dumb decision makers"

 

[Vixen]

dominations is a game of skill... we don't sandbag.. and we prefer no extra troops... learn to play the game!!!!!!

 

[Vixen]

Hi all! We appreciate the feedback and this is something we've been closely monitoring. We'll also be speaking to this in the upcoming State of the Nations.

... the result was to give us more and more special troops... obviously not listening NEXON!!!!!!!!

 

[MonsterMMORPG]

the game is totally cash war right now

you can literally streamroll any base by using sufficient number of cash troops

I voted for A

 

[Vixen]

bump back to top of list