We don`t want DomiNations to be Cash War – we want back our World War!

[Don Mugel]

Thanks to everyone who gave his vote in this poll!

Here are some words to my opinion:
I voted for a maximum of one event army per attack in world war, because there is an access to event armies through the docks and with the weekly events as an result of playing this game. Why? Because it's funny to play the weekly events - this is a positive game feature for me! I don`t use the dock myself, but there are certainly players who have a lot of fun with the expeditions and then these players should be allowed to use their earned rewards – even in world wars.

More than one event army per world war attack is not good.
Why? Because the competition component in the world war suffers: this means less fun in this game feature, especially for the competitive players. If you can buy the victory (or the stalemate), then to the burden of fun. Many draws mean boring world wars and then, with time, increasingly numbers of players will switch to other games.
That`s not good for the players, so it shouldn`t be good for Nexon – just my opinion!

 

[Don Mugel]

This is only one side of the medal. The other side says: 75% of board members want a maximum of one event army / tactic be allowed in the world war per attack!

 

[DynoBot]

Great post and mostly insightful replies. Truly we have gone through many problematic issues with Nexon (too many to name). A very high % of wars ending up in a stalemate will kill this great game fast. Players are quitting the game in many alliances at various levels. Nexon's greed will be their demise. PLEASE PUT AN END TO UNLIMITED TROOPS IN WAR. NO ONE WANTS TO WASTE TIME AND MONEY ONLY TO STALEMATE. Truly, spending money on defences is an absolute waste. No defence can withstand such travesty. PLEASE NEXON LISTEN TO YOUR CUSTOMERS, AS HAPPY CUSTOMERS CAN ONLY HELP YOUR BOTTOMLINE. CUSTOMERS LOST HURTS NOT ONLY NEXON, BUT ALSO US AS A COMMUNITY.

 

[France Solidaire]

ral le bol de tous sa 4 wars d affiler qu on perd systeme des wars injuste on va tous arreter de jouer ecouerant tous on a pas un compte en banque fournis tres injuste a vous de voir nexon!!!!

 

[Maurmo]

What you tend to forget is some alliances like ours don't sandbag. We get put up against sides many levels above us. So we don't stand much of a chance with maxed out bases. You want us give up extra troops so you feel better about stalemates. I don't think so.

 

[Tijsie]

I can say we do use sandbags since a week because we couldn't get a match for many days since Atomic age. And still........ only stalemates! Yes everyone has armies! lots and lots

 

[Penumbra]

He was just cleaning his troop bar to make room for some tactics

 

[Radzeer]

A thief yelling: catch the thief
There is nothing more amusing when a sandbagger whines about his game being ruined, Bwahaha!

 

[Radzeer]

So why don't you stop using stacker accounts? Would be the same, and at least it would be a bit more exciting for you, eh?
And well, 1st Dynasty has atl.20 members who crowned AA troops and defenses, I doubt they didn't bought Extra armies since they were on sale, our little hypocrite. First they crown everything, then they whine, that they don't get an opponent, in WW (of course they don't get anyone, they are the most advanced always, thanks to fat wallets), and then they introduce stackers to kill the game of others, because of that. You have the least moral right here to call others not listening.

 

[Radzeer]

I find it really amusing how sandbaggers do whine about their game being destroyed.
First they crown all AA offenses and defences, then they whine about no opps (we are damn high level suddenly). Then they sandbag to destroy the game of fair play alliances, and when some lower level (by their standards: loser) alliance manages to PS them, they blame Nexon.
Please give me some more lines to read, guys, having fun

 

[Fable]

Empire Guard, clan is doing OK considering. Good to c u too, hope everything is going well for u.

 

[JuDomines]

I don't see the link sandbagger = crown users. This is small thinking and oversimplifying.

 

[Radzeer]

The ones voicing their concerns here (1st Dynasty, UA clones) are both crowners and sandbaggers. Was not putting the = sign myself, that is your, maybe wishful thinking....

 

[Radzeer]

I just saw the comments of the UA and st Dynasty members here. Those I found amusing, as they are blatant sandbaggers. I didn't put the = sign anywhere. That is maybe your wishfull thinking.

 

[JuDomines]

I'm not from UA nor 1D and I also think stalemate is killing the game. And I'm not a big spender neither.

 

[Navalis]

Hey DynoBot! Good to see you back in the mix.

 

[DynoBot]

Hey Radzeer. I am open to suggestions how to run my alliance. Our team morale drops as much as meeting a "sandbag war" when we stalemate over 8 wars in a row not using "sandbags". Sometimes I need to throw some "sandbags" so we can cross our fingers and hope to get a win. We didn't make world war search criteria, we didn't program a game with a destruction glitch for us to lose over 7000 glory, we didn't sell extra troops and give away extra troops. We never lost a war since glory was introduced (and only to 1 team all-time before glory) over hundred of wars before sandbags were introduced. So don't be so short sided. You think we want to match low alliances? According to your theory I should match teams I can only stalemate. Therefore, the bottom teams gain glory, and the top teams gain ZERO. Please tell me a better way to gain glory the all insightful Radzeer.

 

[Europeos]

Do we need to have this conversation again? Let me take a deep breath...
Why using sandbags? Simply because this is the only way to get a match when you have AA and GA players right now, whether you like it or not. I wish we didn't have to, but it's just the way the game is right now, so you can either adapt, use sandbags yourself, arrange h2h on discord, or just do nothing and insult those who don't think like you do.
As far as buying crowns and extra troops is concerned, all I can tell you is I personally don't and I wish there weren't any option to buy any. In fact I wish the game were quite different and crowns or anything else couldn't be bought in the game, but unfortunately we don't live in a perfect world, so again, we can either adapt or stop playing the game. I personally haven't spent any money on the game, but many in my alliance have. Who am I to criticize them for it? In any case, because of events, even without spending any money I've got so many extra troops I could 5 star any base just with them. I don't see any hypocrisy in having those extra troops and recognizing they are a problem. They are there whether I like it or not. Now if Nexon realized they're bad for the game and shouldn't be used in WW I'll be more than happy.
Finally as far as moral is concerned, I don't think I have any lessons to take from you as I at least don't insult or bully people who don't think as I do. If you truly like this game, you shouldn't see me and my alliance as the enemy, but instead realize both your problem (unfair matches) and my problem (stalemates) could be solved if we worked together.

 

[Vixen]

The more we have the conversation the better... fixing sandbagging with glory is only part of the problem... Fixing stalemates and war matching for the top alliances will fix the problems for us middle alliances. Let's not turn on each other... keep the pressure on Nexon.

 

[Europeos]

Exactly Vixen, and this should be done in a respectful way, as you do. Badmouthing won't get us anywhere.
Also, what Radzeer needs to realize is that extra troops will only encourage many alliances playing the leaderboard to use even more sandbags than they already do to avoid stalemates, which will make his problem even worse.