POll + Campaign for Missile Silo to consuming cost to rearm in MP!

POll + Campaign for Missile Silo to consuming cost to rearm in MP!


  • Total voters
    35

T4TiFooS

Approved user
Joined
Apr 16, 2017
Messages
222
BDS , TinSoldier
First needs to remind you it's a request for MP (however am not completely agree with it but it's vital for MP)!

After Winter rush event most of the players now have their Missile Silos!
Now it's the time to ask why Missile Silo should not require any cost to rearm after been attacked? but Bunker does?
​​​​​
Help me to understand the purpose of consuming cost by bunkers, is it because its very dangerous? Well Missile Silo is the deadliest and dangerous one now!
Already we have to use troops cards in WW, so this request does not effect on your project (P2W)!

It is a fair and vital balance to MP:
​​​​​​Missile Silo must require cost (different costs) to rearm based on it have been destroyed, attacked and/or the number of missile it has used!

Or if Missile Silo suppose to stay without any change then two things should be happen:
1) reducing tactics training time
​​​​​​2) reducing costs for merc camp to use in MP.

Please Like and comment to force them listen to us! as they advertising it everywhere that they doing...we will see again its advertising or not!
And please let's this campaign be positive and avoid leave irrelevant comments such as don't cry or just use HT (we know you're pro and maxed AA, but most of us are not)! If have this purpose just vote for YOU ARE OKAY WITH IT and then leave here!
​​​​​​​
Please help this campaign work!

​​​TinSoldier , let's us to know how much your team cares about!
 

Mcnasty

Approved user
Joined
Sep 20, 2017
Messages
456
Bunkers shouldn’t cost anything but the silo should. You don’t pay to rearm your garrison or stable so why should you for the bunker. The silo shoots rockets at **** so it should cost something to rearm.
 

Patrick Bardet

Approved user
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
55
I am against the rearm of missile silo, which will just favor the player who can connect very regularly. Tactics training time can be reduced.
 

T4TiFooS

Approved user
Joined
Apr 16, 2017
Messages
222
Yea it suggested before but there wasn't a serious request for!
Hope they listen to us once!
 

T4TiFooS

Approved user
Joined
Apr 16, 2017
Messages
222
Yea in the reality rockets after fighters are the most expensive military power in the army!
And they are limited!
But here they are free and unlimited!
Wouldn't to make this request bigger for them to limit rockets!
Silo needs a nerf in MP, and if they apply cost to rearm silo it would be fine!
 
Last edited:

T4TiFooS

Approved user
Joined
Apr 16, 2017
Messages
222
The purpose of this request is nerfing Silo in MP! and it's the least change for it!
reducing tactics training time or cost to rearm Silo are in the same requested package!
 
Last edited:

T4TiFooS

Approved user
Joined
Apr 16, 2017
Messages
222
it's obvious like water that it needs to be rearm! Don't know they can't see it or they won't yet !
 

T4TiFooS

Approved user
Joined
Apr 16, 2017
Messages
222
Can we have here any voice from mods/devs?
interesting still we haven't!

​​​​​​@TinSoldier , is it fun to ignore campaigns, discussions, ideas, polls....? it makes you laugh, isn't it? because we only wasting our time!
Yea you are right! It's a good entertainment!!

​​​​​
 

Hurtzilla

Approved user
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
8
Keep it the way it is. If anything, the bunker shouldn’t need oil to rearm. Garrisons and stables don’t need rearmed. Why should bunkers and silos?.... where’s the “drop the mic” button?
 

T4TiFooS

Approved user
Joined
Apr 16, 2017
Messages
222
Yeah thats the point! why should Bunker cost to rearm but others does not?
BTW the purpose of rearming Silo is nerfing it in MP!
But both of them needs to be rearm coz they are not fit for MP!
 
Last edited:

T4TiFooS

Approved user
Joined
Apr 16, 2017
Messages
222
TinSoldier , do the team really a little care about polls / campains ? do they even open them at all ? could you make this clear for us ?? [h=2][/h]
 
Top